![]() For one, if Blizzard seriously thought that playing non-expansion would be better, then they would not have included Lord of Destruction within Diablo II Resurrected and would have made LOD a separate expansion.Ī lot of people feel, myself included, that LoD 1.09 was the height of Diablo 2. ![]() I genuinely want a reasonable explanation as to why people here believe that playing “non-expansion” is better than playing “expansion”. Please, I’m not trying to be blasé for anything, so bear with me, ok? What, really, is the point in playing non-expansion when it means that you’ll be loosing out on a lot of expansion content? Even now, when I play the classic/legacy version of the game, and a create a new hero, I always select the “Expansion Character” checkbox switch even when selecting a non-expansion class. Although methinks that maybe they should have mentioned that in the website, also?īut regardless, I don’t see the point in arguing anyway. ![]() And the Blue post in thread says D2R, Non Expansion wont have shared stash. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |